James Comey used the stupidity of the law defense for Hillary Clinton
FBI Director James Comey used the “stupidity of the law” defense in order to
justify why he did not recommend charges being filed against former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Comey said, “Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information.”
Here, the FBI director is saying that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her college educated staff didn’t know they were breaking the law when they used Clinton’s home email server to send and receive classified information that was marked classified.
Although the Inspector General report says that the former secretary of state violated the law by not properly maintaining emails she had sent and received on her home email server, Comey doubts that a “reasonable prosecutor” would prosecute the case.
According to Comey, the FBI doesn’t have evidence showing that Clinton and her staff intentionally and willfully mishandle large amounts of classified information “in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct.”
As y'all can see, Comey isn't paying any never mind to the fact that he said Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information;” which is, in and of itself, evidence that Clinton and her staff were reckless to the point that a “reasonable prosecutor” could infer ill intent on the part of Clinton and her staff.
Comey said, “Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information.”
Here, the FBI director is saying that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her college educated staff didn’t know they were breaking the law when they used Clinton’s home email server to send and receive classified information that was marked classified.
Although the Inspector General report says that the former secretary of state violated the law by not properly maintaining emails she had sent and received on her home email server, Comey doubts that a “reasonable prosecutor” would prosecute the case.
According to Comey, the FBI doesn’t have evidence showing that Clinton and her staff intentionally and willfully mishandle large amounts of classified information “in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct.”
As y'all can see, Comey isn't paying any never mind to the fact that he said Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information;” which is, in and of itself, evidence that Clinton and her staff were reckless to the point that a “reasonable prosecutor” could infer ill intent on the part of Clinton and her staff.
comments powered by Disqus